Most of these source are emission line sources, not contiunuum sources, as shown in this plot How bright are these sources?
lunar age | |||||
(days) | U | B | V | R | I (mag/square arcsec) |
0 | 22.0 | 22.7 | 21.8 | 20.9 | 19.9 |
3 | 21.5 | 22.4 | 21.7 | 20.8 | 19.9 |
7 | 19.9 | 21.6 | 21.4 | 20.6 | 19.7 |
10 | 18.5 | 20.7 | 20.7 | 20.3 | 19.5 |
14 | 17.0 | 19.5 | 20.0 | 19.9 | 19.2 |
Optical:
For broadband work, for example in the V band, mag/arcsec at good site so we switch over to background limited around m=22 for good image quality, switch over around m=20 for poorer image quality. Consequently, image quality matters for faint objects!!
One can choose narrower filters to improve the situation, but still have to then pay the price of longer exposure times.
Optical spectroscopy: sky emission generally not much of a problem except around lines.
IR: For broadband work in H band, mag/arcsec; in K band, mag/arcsec. So for all except bright objects, we're background limited. For infrared spectra, it's hard to estimate S/N : depends on where your feature is located.
Sky brightness from most sources varies with time and position in the sky in an irregular fashion. Consqeuently, it's essentially impossible to estimate the sky a priori: sky must be determined from your observations, and if your observations don't distinguish object from sky, you'd better measure sky close by in location and in time: especially critical in the IR.