Next: Initial Mass Function
Up: Potsdam 2003
Previous: Potsdam 2003
- Review/overview of star formation histories (not
structural, kinematics, etc.). Complementary (contradictory?) talks by
Smecker-Hane, Venn, Ferguson, Harris, Grebel, Olszewski, Mayer
- Components of star formation histories:
- Star formation rate as function of lookback time
- Initial mass function
- Chemical evolution
- Star formation histories of Local Group galaxies
as a cosmological training sample and cosmological probe?
- Parameterization of star formation in models. Role of various
factors in triggering/regulation of star formation:
- Internal processes, e.g. gas density, gravitational instability,
supernovae
- Internal-dynamics triggered, e.g. bars and spiral structure
- External-dynamics triggered, e.g. interactions and mergers
- External-radiation triggered, e.g. ionizing background
- Local Group as a key to helping to understand galaxies at higher
redshift:
- Initial mass function: affects rate of luminosity evolution, chemical
evolution . High mass end important for chemical evolution, star
formation histories. Low mass end important for mass-to-light, star
formation histories.
- History of star formation rate: dominates rate of luminosity
evolution, galaxy counts. Constrains star formation mechanism. Key point
for both issues is burstiness.
- Recent observational progress has been largely
incremental; possibly some overgeneralizations, e.g:
- The IMF is universal with some scatter and with a few
possible exceptions
- Star formation is bursty in a minority of galaxies
studied
- Metallicities are correlated with absolute magnitude
except there is a range of metallicities in all
systems studied
- Time may be ripe for fruitful interchange between
observations and models
- Modellers need constraints for free parameters
- Observers need justification for more telescope time
- What are the best points for comparison?
Next: Initial Mass Function
Up: Potsdam 2003
Previous: Potsdam 2003
2003-06-11